Curmudgeon's Commentary Archive

Twittering to Death
Posterity's Debt To Me
Butchers, Bankers, Cong
.
The Battle for Honest Money
Coping with Deflation
From Riches to Rags
Fiddler's Broken Wrist
Jack-lantern Wealth
Gold Confiscation
Look Out Below!
Voting for Maggie
1932
Poobahs of Positivism
A Wistful Vista
1948
An Unknown Road
Vern's Precipitation
IOU-nothing
Blood In the Streets
How To Buy Gold
Natalie's Predicament
America Descending
Just Plain Stealing?
A thing to fear
Unstuffing a Lifetime
Heavenly Sex
FDR & History
Chicken Little Convention  
Lead us not into temptation
My Obituary
 Legislature and Embryos
Ac-cent-tchu-ate the Positive
What Fools, We Mortals
Unvarnished Truth
End-of-everything Blues
My Immigrant Relative
The Eloquent Pogo
Nesta's Complaint
Unionize School Children
Hucksterism Gone Wild
Unmanageable Religion

PUBLIC DEBT...1/20/12

$15,236,271,879,792.78


 Web search:


© 2012-Wrisley.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

January 28, 2012

An interesting question to ponder over the weekend:
Why don't evangelicals support Ron Paul?

     Jon Basil Utley, Associate Publisher of The American Conservative, wonders aloud: 

    "Today [Evangelicals] prefer Senator Santorum or Newt Gingrich, both Catholics, to Ron Paul, who is Baptist. Santorum is no libertarian believer in limited government (he would use government to enforce his social values) and urges absolute support for Israel and the military industrial complex. These evangelicals don’t want peace because it would mean postponing Armageddon. That’s why their leaders oppose Ron Paul."  Daily Reckoning

     Bill Bonner, founder of Daily Reckoning, met Jon Utley Tuesday evening, which is why this topic cropped up in Bonner's ramble on Friday.  Bonner points out Ron Paul opposes abortion, gay marriage and promiscuity. He’s never been divorced. Two of his brothers are ministers. And he’s a Baptist. What more could they want?

      But evangelicals reject him.  Hm-m-m-m-m. 


Obama Decries Rising Cost of College Education
So reads an Associated Press headline today.

     President Obama will be in the news several times a week from now until election day demanding that one group or another do something to put the brakes on rising costs or "invest in job creation.". Today he wants an overhaul of the higher education financial aid system.  He tells colleges and universities that they may lose federal money if they fail to control spiraling tuition costs.

     Spiraling tuition prices are only a reflection of the longtime inflation policy of the administration and Congress.  If he wants to put the lid on inflation Mr. Obama should send Mr. Geithner over to speak to Dr. Bernanke at the Federal Reserve and suggest he stop the inflation machine.  The whole idea of the Fed's near zero percent interest policy is to stir up some inflation to make the economy look healthier.   

    Obama gets a lot of mileage out of billionaire Warren Buffet's remark about his secretary paying a higher tax rate than he, Buffett, does.  People eat it up.  A really, really rich guy suggesting the rich be taxed at higher rates. 

   In 1948 Warren was a teenager.  The financial world wasn't paying much attention to him.  Not too many were following his daddy, either.  Congressman Howard Buffet, was making waves in a persistent call to restore the nation to a system of honest money.  

        "Unless you are willing to surrender your children and your country to galloping inflation, war and slavery, then this cause demands your support. For if human liberty is to survive in America, we must win the battle to restore honest money."  Howard Buffett, 1948.

   At the time of Buffett's remarks we didn't personally care what backed the dollar.  It was Spring, 1948, and we were scheduled to stride down a church aisle with a bride that very summer.  (To everyone's astonishment, including our own, we're still together.) 

    It would be the switch from silver coins to nickel-coated copper ones that aroused our interest in money questions in 1965. We wondered why the substitution was necessary.  Then, with price inflation causing misery in the 1970s we really got interested in what was happening to the U.S. dollar and luckily crossed paths with the Committee for Monetary Research and Education.  

     CMRE may seem a tad too scholarly for many readers, but some of the best minds on the subject of money contribute to its work.  Its library of tracts and books abounds in good sense and accurate analysis.  This organization is on the web at CMRE.org 


Amazon.com emailed us today to remind us we bought $113.03 worth of books from them last year.

Hello from Amazon.com,

As you may or may not be aware Amazon.com LLC is not required to collect sales or use taxes in all states, including the state of South Carolina.

The South Carolina Department of Revenue requires us to provide the following notice to you:

You may owe South Carolina use tax on purchases you made from Amazon.com LLC during the previous calendar year. The amount of tax you may owe is based on the total sales price of the items you purchased during the previous calendar year. The total sales price of only purchases you had shipped to South Carolina in 2011 was $113.02. This is the amount that you may include on your South Carolina income tax return to calculate the appropriate use tax owed unless you have already paid the tax.

          Amazon makes clear it will not supply this information to the state tax collectors, but the reminders to South Carolina customers will probably nudge more taxpayers than usual to "remember" the on-line purchases they made in 2011 upon which a state sales tax is owed. 


Slow Economic Growth in 2011

     One must dig for the number, but the U.S. Commerce Department said today the economy grew 1.7 percent in 2011 after expanding 3 percent in 2010.  

     News media are concentrating on a 4th quarter up-tick and the actual number for the entire year is treated as a secondary fact.  

← The Fed'l Reserve aims at a growth rate of 2 to 3 percent but its customary methods of pumping the economy aren't producing the customary  traction.  

        If the Fed's monetary policy can't make the economy hum, what'll it take?  

       The question promises to be a biggie in the political campaign of 2012. 

DeMint's Balanced Budget Amendment Unrealistic.

    You may have noticed the Public Debt number in the left-hand column of this page has been pretty much stuck at $15.236 trillion since early this month.  It isn't that the Treasury Department isn't spending plenty of money - - it just can't BORROW until Congress approves President Obama's recent request for a debt ceiling increase.  It's kind of a moot question.  The rules are set up to permit an increase of more than a trillion dollars no matter what Congress might do to stifle it.  

    S.C. Senator Jim DeMint says "Since President Obama has taken office, our national debt has increased by more than $4.5 trillion to pay for a failed stimulus, a health care takeover, and bailouts to special interests. It’s time to stop the reckless spending and debt that our children and grandchildren will have to pay for.

   "Americans are looking for courageous leadership to save our nation from fiscal collapse. Americans understand that we must pass a Balanced Budget Amendment to force Congress from spending more than we’re bringing in. I challenge members of Congress in both parties to open their eyes to what is happening in Europe, to stop with the meaningless show votes, and get serious about our debt crisis before it is too late."

   DeMint's instincts are good, but the notion that the U.S. Constitution must be amended to "force Congress from spending more than it brings in" istroubling.  It says - Congress is incapable of doing what it was elected to do so we-the-people must go to the trouble of contriving stricter rules under which they conduct the people's business.  

   Congress reflects the will of the people.  If voters want representatives who are spendthrifts there is nothing tinkering with a Constitution can do to stop it.

   Congress won't change its habits until the people change their demands. What's the chances of THAT happening?


A hopeful comment on the fiscal plight of Greece.   

     "Look… I know in my heart of hearts that Greece is going to default, sooner or later… But… if the actual default can wait for more stabilization to happen in the Eurozone, then the foundation might be strong enough to withstand a default… The center is strong, but needs to get stronger… a default now, would be ugly for all of us."  ~Chuck Butler 

     This guy has made a good living for years closely following monetary struggles of  nations  around the world.  


    If you've had the feeling your Kindly Editor is pretty much out of touch with reality,  you may be right.  

    We just took Charles Murray's "Bubble Test" and, as you can see from our score, we are apparently seriously insulated by an elitist bubble!

    Murray is a sociologist who believes the main division in America is between the elite and the non-elite.  

   We've never owned a pickup truck...we don't know anything about Who's Who in Nascar.  We don't hunt or fish.  Obviously, we must be trapped in an "elite bubble" according to Mr. Murray.  

   Want to find out how YOU stand?  Here's the test.  Takes only a couple of minutes.  How Thick Is Your Bubble?


   Inflation?  Deflation? 
The Fed will do anything to avoid deflation. 

    The Federal Reserve will keep its finger on the INFLATION button through 2014.  This announcement today caused a $33.00 jump in the price of gold and a big bump in the price of silver.  

   It's a continuation of  an easy money policy which theoretically will make taking on debt easier to bear and thus stimulate the economy. It's not working like it used to, but the Federal Reserve has no option except to keep the lending rate near zero plus buy gov't debt the market doesn't want. 

   The danger; the exercise could become an example of the futility of pushing on a string if faith in bank managed fiat currency wanes. 

Is your spare cash working for you?  

      A dear friend complains her checking account is paying only 0.1 percent annual interest despite the fact she maintains a comfortable balance.  That means she's losing money because the annualized price inflation rate is about 3 percent.  

      She's switching to another bank which offers a savings account which pays 0.9 percent annually.  She's still losing purchasing power, but not as fast.  She can access her funds at any time without penalty and no maintenance fees are charged.

      Why not play the stock and bond markets with spare cash instead?  She says she doesn't have the knack nor the stomach for risk taking.  She's not attracted to CDs, either, chiefly because she wants to be able to grab her money and run at a moment's notice.    

   

 

  

 

   

   

.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


web counter